Career Breaks or Career Gaps are more common than ever before. The reasons will differ for each candidate, but it is essential that we don't take the easy way out and reject them on paper just because we recruiters and HR folk have a ton of resumes to go through. That's an injustice to the candidate and your organization since you could be throwing away a diamond along with other gems.
This is what I did when I was in the corporate world:
- Reviewed and shortlisted resumes based on the skill-job match alone.
- Did not reject any candidate who was returning from a career break or gap of any sort if there was a match between the skill-job match, and call them for an interview.
- Kept 2 or 3 questions to understand the nature and reasons for the gap in career during the interview.
- Conducted the interview as fairly and as objectively as possible.
- Rejected the candidate if I found them unsuitable for any role-related reason other than having a career gap.
Just like cutting a diamond from ore takes care and time, so too does this. Then why invest this time?
My reasoning:
- Such candidates can join faster since they don't have a notice period to serve.
- They are more willing to negotiate on compensation because they want to get back to work (doesn't mean we shortchange them on the CTC because they will find out sooner or later and then become disengaged).
For those recruiters / managers that think of this as time being wasted:
- Remember that interviewing candidates is a key part of your role.
- You are anyway going to interview candidates, so it might as well be someone whose skills match the job, irrespective if there is a gap in service or not.
If shortlisted, explain this reasoning to the next interviewer, especially the skills - job match.
As you can see, any recruiter can do these things - it requires a little courage to not take the easy way out.