![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCbKw7o7rQp_Ml5_fSp6iVaFhe-n_yY5rsZRD57LgZDF6QddCX8b6elO1yzU7dB-0p75h4vaQ_HZ8vq_fp6XeJ_c0TWH89vONNoxkd2t3i3N1sElOE733-iWZQ3OmhywM1oiZC1A_Nd4G-3wsRPiiw7kXX5Nw0DaR4lJMfYkdTvn4NRApqb1_N75J0-x1W/w400-h225/RBIMG_20240323_215144.jpg) |
Photo Credit Ryan Barretto Mar 2024 |
Few people would deny the impact of well-being on the benefit of the organization. This approach tends to get pushed to the back burner for short-term gains (shareholder value?) over the long term growth and survival of the organization, especially when there are leaders or managers with a high need for controlling people and aggressive competitiveness. Hybrid or remote workplaces have only accelerated these tensions, which then negatively impacts well-being, and the progress of the organization.
With the above in mind, this article asks an extremely pertinent question, which is it's title.
From the article - "We need to reset the employer/employee relationship. We need to establish clear and fair principles for working in a remote or hybrid world. In a way which sets reasonable expectations for all parties and holds employers and employees to account."
I think the ability to leverage the employees's #strengths in their work will provide huge dividends to the organization and employees.
Your thoughts?
Read the rest of the article here.